Wednesday, November 25, 2009

DoingAndAssessing_a_MathProject

MAED 314A Assignment #3
Doing and Assessing a Math Project
Designing a Math Project
Topic: Fractal Geometry
Group members: Ralph Baker, Laura Cang, Mina Nozar
November 23, 2009

1a) Doing a Math Project:
Topic: Fractal geometry
Description: From the position of Math 11 students, research Fractals
Format: Presentation

Description:
 Fractal: pattern that repeats itself, with detailed structure at different magnification scales
              Infinitely complex but bases on incredibly simple principles (additions & subtraction)
                 

Mandelbrot and Julia Sets:
   Most studied family of functions parameterized by a variable, c:    z = z2 + c
Z and c are complex numbers

Julia set will vary on the complex plane.                                                                                          Some of these Julia sets will be connected, and some will be disconnected, and so this character.   Mandlebrot set is the set for values of c where the Julia set is connected.
When z→0 the point is coloured black
When z -> infinity, the point is coloured.  The colours are chosen arbitrarily but each colour represents a different rate of change

Iterative/recursive process: Millions and millions of operations to produce a complete set
                                                In each iteration, the the output in as the input for the next iteration
                 Simplest: Self-similar - smallest pieces identical to the whole, except for a dialation
                                 Ex: Sierpinski triangle/gasket/seive, Sierpinski carpet, Koch curve

Fractal dimension: Not a whole number!

Instances/examples of Fractals and scaling patterns
Nature: Clouds: puffs of puffs
             Mountains: Peaks within peaks
             Coastlines: Little bits looks like larger bits
             Trees: Branches of Branches or Branches
             Fern leaf: Series of fronds extending from the spine to the left and right,
                              each frond made of sub-fornds,
                              each sub-frond made of sub-fronds
             Broccoli romanesco, a cauliflower-like plant: Head consisting of a spiral swirl of florets,          
                                                                                       each floret a spiral swirl of a sub-florets,                                                                    
                                                                                       each sub-floret a spiral swirl of sub-sub florets
Art & Architecture: African textile, sculpture, architecture, and hairstyle designs

Applications: Modeling, Image compression
      

References:
1.    Ron Eglash, African fractals, in buildings and braids http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/ron_eglash_on_african_fractals.html
2.    Ron Eglash, African Fractals
3.    Ian Stewart, The Magical Maze – Seeing the World Through Mathematical Eyes, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997
4.    Ian Stewart and Martin Golubitsky, Fearful Symmetry – Is God A Geometer?, Penguin Group, 1992
5.    Hans Lauwerier, Fractals – Endlessly Repeaterd Geometrical Figures, Princeton University Press, 1991
6.    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle
7.    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_carpet

1b) Assessing a Math Project: Individual, 500 word reflections.











2. Designing a Project
A project we, as teachers, could assign to our Math 11 students:
Students should be able to identify the basic building block of such a complex pattern.
a) Find an instance of fractalization in your life
b) Discern what the single building block (seed shape) would be
c) Draw or model the building block
d) Describe the instructions (transformations/translations) required to build the full fractal form
ie. what does the iterative process entail?
e) Determine the dimensionality of the fractal chosen



Assessing the project based on the following Rubric
 

Description
0
1
2
3
Choice of fractal with description and where you found it with justification of your choice.
Inappropriate choice, lacking description
Incomplete justification for fractal choice

Well thought out.  Description demonstrates understanding.
Description includes complete justification of choice and process for locating your fractal.  Demonstrates full understanding of concept.
Identify the single building block
No block identified.
Indicated choice of building block.  Description may be unclear or incomplete.
Description of unit is understandable.  Indicates how you found the building block.
Clear description of block.  Process for identification obvious and correct.
Drawing or model of single block
Drawing or model is incomplete, demonstrates little effort.
Drawing or model is adequate but unlabeled and incomplete.
Adequate drawing or model.  Diagrams are labeled and demonstrates thought.
Aesthetically pleasing drawing or model.  Diagrams are correct, clear and mathematically relevant.
Description of the iteration
Description uses no mathematically relevant language and is lacking clarity or is incorrect.
Description uses little to no mathematically relevant language and may be incomplete
Description is adequate and uses some mathematically relevant language
Description is clear, mathematically relevant, and demonstrates a high level of mathematical understanding
Model/Drawing with minimum 2 interations
Model/Drawing is incomplete and demonstrates little to no understanding of fractalization.
Iterations follow the description to some degree.
Model is clear and follows iterative description with few errors.
Model is aesthetically pleasing and demonstrates a high level of understanding and follows the iterative description closely

 

 

 

 

 

 

Presentation

Instances/examples

                                                                                                               Fern

 

 

Romanesco broccoli

 

 

 

 

                                                            Tree

Coastline

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sierpinski triangle/gasket/seive:

Plane fractal, one of the basic examples of similar-sets,  named after the Polish mathematician Wacław Sierpiński who described it in 1915

 

Generation/Iteration algorithm:

Start with an equilateral triangle

Make a triangle with size ½ height and ½ width of the original triangle

Seed shape: triangle                                         Scaling transformation size: 1/2

Make three copies, and position the three shrunken triangles so that each triangle touches the two other triangles at a corner.  A central triangle hole merges in the central hole

Repeat with each of the smaller triangles.  Iterate infinite number of times!

 

Fractal dimention: Side can be doubled in size by taking three identical copies:

 

Sierpinski carpet: A plane fractal - generalization of the Cantor set to 2D - first described Wacław Sierpińskiin 1916

 


Generation/Iteration algorithm:

Seed shape: square                                                             Scaling transformation size: 1/3

Start with a square

Divide it into 9 squares, each one-      third the size of the orignial square

Remove the central square

Repeat with each of the smaller   squares.  Iterate infinite number of times!

 

 

Fractal dimention: Takes 8 copies to make the size of the size increase by a factor of 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Koch Curve: Another example of similar-sets, named for Swedish mathematician Helge von Koch

Seed shape:  spike
                                                                                                                                   Scaling transformation size: 1/3

Start with astraight line segment (stage 0)

Replace the middle third of this segment by two pieces, each as long as the middle third (joined like two sides of an equilateral triangle - spike)

At each succeeding stage, replace each line segment at its middle third by a spike.

Repeat the above process infinitely. The limit of this infinite process results in the Koch curve

 

 

 

 


No comments:

Post a Comment